What I can’t figure out is how anyone can make out Prop 37 as
‘anti-science’? IF the scientific data presented by Monsanto, Dow, and
DuPont was ‘actual and rigorous’ science then most of us having issues
with GM foods either wouldn’t ( because the foods are actually safe ) or
would ( because the foods aren’t safe ). The fact is simply that the
‘science’ produced by these companies does not meet basic standards for
controls; is not independently funded. No controls and self funded?
That’s not science.
Therefore, being against PROP 37 isn’t
anti-science whatsoever. What we want is labeling!! Prove to us with
unbiased research that GM foods are safe for me to consume, safe for the
environment, and unquestionably more sustainable than conventional and
organic methods then I’m willing to trust the ‘science’. Without this
assurance, we can only assume that these companies are more interested
in their profits than the health and wellness of the individual
consuming their products.
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/genetically-374572-engineered-crops.html
PLEASE VOTE YES on Prop 37 this November
